Under what condition can a SkyWest policy overrule a Federal Aviation Regulation?

A SkyWest policy can overrule a Federal Aviation Regulation when it is more restrictive. This is important because aviation regulations and company policies are designed to ensure the safety and efficiency of operations. If a policy is more restrictive, it generally provides an additional layer of safety for crew and passengers.

For example, while federal regulations set a minimum standard for safety and operations, an airline may choose to implement more stringent measures—such as tighter maintenance schedules, additional training requirements, or stricter operational protocols. This ensures that even if a regulation allows for certain practices, the airline can prioritize higher safety measures that exceed what is federally required. Thus, adherence to these more rigorous standards also demonstrates a commitment to safety, potentially resulting in better operational outcomes and fewer incidents.

In contrast, policies that are less restrictive than the federal regulations would not be permissible, as they would not fulfill the legal obligations set forth by those regulations. Similarly, a policy that is the same as a FAR does not constitute an overrule; rather, it aligns with federal standards. While specific approval from the FAA may allow for certain deviations, it does not constitute a blanket condition under which SkyWest policies can override federal regulations without those higher safety requirements.